Gruter v. Lehrer McGovern Bovis, Inc.
Opinion of the Court
—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Franklin Weissberg, J., and a jury), entered June 16, 1999, insofar as appealed from, in favor of plaintiff laborer and against defendant-appellant construction manager, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
A fair interpretation of the evidence supports a finding that appellant actively supervised safety at the work site, and had the authority to correct the unsafe condition caused by the IV2 to 3-inch high planned concrete lip in the floor (see, Russin v Picciano & Son, 54 NY2d 311, 316-317). Such evidence includes appellant’s project superintendent’s testimony that appellant was responsible for procuring and supervising construction work; hadmultiple offices on site in which it held meetings with contractors; reviewed work in progress to approve requisitions and invoices; had an obligation to initiate, monitor and administer a site safety program; erected and maintained all reasonable safety measures, including signs and warnings for
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.