Keefe v. E & D Specialty Stands, Inc.
Cases that cite this one
9 later published cases cite this decision.
- Norcia v. Dieber's Castle Tavern, Ltd. (District Court, S.D. New York 2013)
- Leo v. Long Island Railroad (District Court, S.D. New York 2015)
- Adebiyi v. Yankee Fiber Control, Inc. (District Court, S.D. New York 2010)
- Rojas v. New York City Tr. Auth. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2019)
- Cedeno v. Broan-Nutone, LLC (District Court, E.D. New York 2019)
- Garrow v. Rosettie Associates (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- Shi Pei Fang v. Heng Sang Realty Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
- Man-Kit Lei v. City University of New York (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
- Shi Pei Fang v. Heng Sang Realty Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff suffered a laceration to his ulnar nerve while performing iron work on bleachers and, despite three surgeries, has a permanent loss of feeling in his right hand, which is his dominant hand, and a permanent 50% loss of strength in that hand. After a jury trial on damages, plaintiff was awarded $1,000,000 for future pain and suffering to cover a 40-year period. We reject defendant’s contention that the award deviates materially from what would be reasonable compensation (see, CPLR 5501 [c]; McKeon v Sears, Roebuck & Co., 262 AD2d 7, lv denied 93 NY2d 818; see also, Van Deusen v Norton Co., 204 AD2d 867, 870-871). We further reject defendant’s contention that Supreme Court erred in admitting evidence regarding the wage rates and fringe benefits of union ironworkers. Although plaintiff had not begun his apprenticeship at the time of the accident, he had completed all written and physical tests and had been notified that he would be accepted into the apprenticeship program. Thus, the loss of earnings was established with reasonable certainty (see, Cranston v Oxford Resources Corp., 173 AD2d 757, 758, lv denied 78 NY2d 860; see
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.