Lauretta v. County of Suffolk
Cases that cite this one
9 later published cases cite this decision.
- Carvey v. Kandalaft (New York Supreme Court, Kings County 2025)
- Carvey v. Kandalaft (New York Supreme Court, Kings County 2025)
- Becerril v. Sol Cab Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
- Lewis v. City of New York (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- Sambajon v. Everett (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- Taher v. Valerio-Mena (Civil Court of the City of New York 2003)
- Omar v. Goodman (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
- Ingram v. Doe (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
- Scudera v. Mahbubur (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated October 22, 1998, which, inter alia, granted the separate motions of the defendants County of Nassau and Nassau County Police Department, and the defendants County of Suffolk and Suffolk County Police Department, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.
In support of their motions for summary judgment, the defendants submitted medical evidence which established that the plaintiff had not sustained a serious injury within the
Furthermore, the plaintiff’s allegation in her affidavit that she was forced to curtail recreational and household activities was insufficient to demonstrate that she had sustained a medically-determined injury or impairment which prevented her from performing substantially all of the material acts constituting her normal daily activities for not less than 90 of the first 180 days following the accident (see, Insurance Law § 5102 [d]; Rum v Pam Transp., 250 AD2d 751). Thompson, J. P., Krausman, H. Miller and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.