Serota v. Mayfair Super Markets, Inc.
Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, to permanently enjoin the sublease of certain commercial property in which the defendant Island
Ordered that the order dated April 23, 1999, is affirmed; and it is further,
Ordered that the order dated May 13, 1999, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,
Ordered that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs.
The determination as to whether to issue a preliminary injunction is a matter left to the sound discretion of the trial court (see, Doe v Axelrod, 73 NY2d 748, 750). In the case at bar, the court providently exercised its discretion since the respondents made a sufficient showing to warrant the granting of preliminary injunctive relief (see, Doe v Axelrod, supra). Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the respondents have not been awarded the ultimate relief sought, as the plaintiff is not enjoined from interfering with the sublease in the event facts come to light tending to show that the operation of the sublease would violate the lease agreement.
The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Thompson, Sullivan and Altman, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.