Spectron Glass & Electronics, Inc. v. Marianovsky
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Balance Point Divorce Funding, LLC v. Scrantom (District Court, S.D. New York 2013)
- Cray v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance (District Court, W.D. New York 2001)
- Ashland Management Inc. v. Altair Investments (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for misappropriation of trade secrets, breach of contract, and breach of fiduciary duty, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Dunn, J.), dated March 22, 1999, as denied their motion for summary judgment.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly found triable issues of fact with respect to whether the information allegedly misappropriated by the defendants constitutes trade secrets and whether the defendants used such information to gain an unfair advantage over their competitors (see, Matter of New York Tel. Co. v Public Serv. Commn., 56 NY2d 213; Minnesota Min. & Mfg. Co. v Technical Tape Corp., 23 Misc 2d 671, affd 15 AD2d 960). Joy, J. P., Friedmann, Krausman and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.