Winfield v. Metropolitan Transit Authority
Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal,
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the order entered February 25, 1999, is reinstated.
The Supreme Court erred in granting the plaintiff’s motion to vacate the order entered February 25, 1999, striking the complaint, as she failed to offer a reasonable excuse for her default in opposing that motion (see, CPLR 5015; Wynne v Wagner, 262 AD2d 556; Roussodimou v Zafiriadis, 238 AD2d 568). Accordingly, the order entered February 25, 1999, striking the complaint must be reinstated. O’Brien, J. P., Altman, Friedmann, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.