Loadholt v. Rams Beer & Soda, Inc.
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Joaquin v. Munoz (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
- Jones v. Lynch (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
- Aiello v. Long Island College Hospital (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (G. Aronin, J.), entered May 27, 1999, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the plaintiff and against them in the principal sum of $100,000.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The defendants argue that the Supreme Court abused its discretion in permitting, inter alia, evidence of injury to the plaintiff’s left knee despite the fact that no such injury was indicated in the bill of particulars. However, “leave to amend a bill of particulars is ordinarily to be freely given in the absence of prejudice or surprise” (Kyong Hi Wohn v County of Suffolk,
The defendants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J. P., Sullivan, Florio and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.