People v. Lawrence
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Oswold (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- People v. Herron (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2021)
- HOWINGTON, TYWAN, PEOPLE v (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- People v. Howington (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- People v. Howington (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- People v. Smith (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
- People v. Aristud (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: An issue concerning the interpretation or application of a criminal statute or a challenge to the legal sufficiency of the factual allegations of an indictment does not survive a defendant’s plea of guilty (see, People v Levin, 57 NY2d 1008, 1009, rearg denied 58 NY2d 824; People v Thomas, 53 NY2d 338, 340, 343-345). A guilty plea also forecloses any challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence before the Grand Jury (see, People v Simms, 269 AD2d 788; People v Buthy, 85 AD2d 890). Defendant’s contention that the evidence before the Grand Jury was legally insufficient to establish larceny by extortion therefore is not properly before us (see, Penal Law § 155.40 [2]; § 155.05 [2] [e]). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Harvey, J. — Grand Larceny, 4th Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Hayes, Wisner and Kehoe, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.