Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000

Banks v. United Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided September 14, 2000

275 A.D.2d 623; 713 N.Y.S.2d 53; 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9160

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

BAGLEY, GILBERT v. ROCHESTER GENERAL HOSPITAL (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
Bagley v. Rochester General Hospital (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
Bagley v. Rochester General Hospital (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
Juseinoski v. New York Hospital Medical Center (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
Juseinoski v. New York Hosp. Med. Ctr. of Queens (New York Supreme Court, Kings County 2004)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth Thompson, Jr., J.), entered January 14, 1999, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*624Given the emergency room doctor’s good faith belief that his patient, who collapsed at work, died under “sudden and unexplained circumstances”, he had a duty to call the Medical Examiner’s office to inquire if the death would fall under that office’s jurisdiction (see, Westchester County Administrative Law §§ 273.151, 273.141). This was especially true since the emergency room doctor had been informed by the decedent’s physician that there were no prior abnormalities, and he had been unsuccessful in attempting to reach a family member. Because we find no negligence with respect to the emergency room doctor, there is no basis for holding the hospital liable for its employee pursuant to a theory of respondeat superior.

Finally, once the Medical Examiner determined to accept jurisdiction, it had authority to conduct an autopsy, without first obtaining the consent of a family member, where no objection had been raised (Public Health Law § 4210-c [1]; compare, Harris-Cunningham v Medical Examiner of N. Y County, 261 AD2d 285, with Liberman v Riverside Mem. Chapel, 225 AD2d 283, and Bambrick v Booth Mem. Med. Ctr., 190 AD2d 646), and the Medical Examiner’s office had no reason to believe that the procedure was contrary to the decedent’s religious beliefs. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Wallach and Lerner, JJ.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.