Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000

Lunney v. Selsky

Lunney v. Selsky
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided September 14, 2000
275 A.D.2d 820; 713 N.Y.S.2d 300; 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9190
Lunney v. Selsky

Opinion of the Court

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit inmates from possessing a weapon, fighting, assault and refusing a direct order. This determination was affirmed upon petitioner’s administrative appeal. Petitioner thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding and we confirm.

Contrary to petitioner’s contention, we find that the misbehavior report, combined with the hearing testimony, including the reporting officer’s testimony as to her eyewitness observations, provide substantial evidence of petitioner’s guilt (see, Matter of Foster v Coughlin, 76 NY2d 964, 966). Although petitioner claimed that he was not the initial aggressor in the fight and denied possessing the weapon and refusing a direct order, this raised a credibility "issue for the Hearing Officer to *821resolve (see, Matter of De La Rosa v Portuondo, 247 AD2d 810, 811).

Petitioner’s remaining arguments have been examined and found to be unpersuasive.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.