Torres v. Goord
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Davis v. Annucci (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- Davis v. Annucci (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- Johnson v. Sabourin (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
- Chaney v. Goord (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
- Russell v. Selsky (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
- Amaker v. Senkowski (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner challenges a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit inmates from assaulting staff, disobeying a direct order and refusing a search and frisk. The misbehavior report, written by the correction officer who was the victim of the assault, relates that petitioner became agitated during a frisk and while patting petitioner’s right arm, he hit the correction officer in the face with his elbow. The detailed misbehavior report, together with corroborating testimony from other correction officers in the vicinity and petitioner’s admission, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see, Matter of
We also reject petitioner’s assertion that he was denied due process by the failure of other correction officers who were peripherally involved in the incident to endorse the misbehavior report or author their own (see, 7 NYCRR 251-3.1) inasmuch as petitioner has failed to establish any prejudice resulting therefrom (see, Matter of Moore v Goord, 271 AD2d 448, 448-449, lv denied 95 NY2d 758). Petitioner’s remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Graffeo, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.