In re Katherine D.
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- In re Christopher M. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Contrary to respondent’s contentions, petitioner established that it made the required diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parent-child relationship and that its service plan was tailored to remedy respondent’s parental deficiencies (see, Matter of Katara F., 231 AD2d 844, lv denied 89 NY2d 805; Matter of Christy C., 226 AD2d 770, lv denied 88 NY2d 808). Family Court’s findings of permanent neglect are supported by clear and convincing evidence (see, Matter of Katara F., supra), and
Respondent failed to preserve for our review her contention that Social Services Law § 384-b is overly vague and violates her constitutional rights to equal protection of the laws and due process (see, Matter of Marcena S., 103 AD2d 847; Matter of Dedrick M., 89 AD2d 781). (Appeal from Order of Chautauqua County Family Court, Claire, J. — Terminate Parental Rights.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Wisner, Kehoe and Balio, JJ.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.