Feldstein v. Rounick
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision. The 4 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Bridgewater Operating Corp. v. Feldstein (2d Cir. 2003)
- Roland v. Benson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
- Manzo v. Gross (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
- Feldstein v. Rounick (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of a contract to sell real property, the defendants separately appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (D’Emilio, J.), dated January 31, 2000, which, inter alia, granted the plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment, and (2) a judgment of the same court, entered February 8, 2000, which directed specific performance of the contract.
Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,
Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs.
The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see, CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).
The record demonstrates, as a matter of law, that the plaintiff buyer was ready, willing, and able to perform his obligations under the contract, even though his tender of performance was excused by the defendant seller’s anticipatory
The defendants’ remaining contention is without merit. Santucci, J. P., Thompson, Sullivan and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.