Blumberg v. Salem Truck Leasing, Inc.
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- Lapidus v. 1050 Tenants Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- McManmon v. York Hill Housing, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
- Milom v. Marble Hall Apartments, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
- Greenberg v. Kruse (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
- Jarrett v. Berner (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)
- Fernandes v. Lawrence (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
- Small v. Chrysler Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants James Sherman, Automation Transportation Corp., and Grocery Haulers of Delaware, Inc., s/h/a Grocery Haulers, Inc. and Grocery Haulers of Delaware, Inc., appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated November 4, 1999, which denied their motion to change the venue of the action from Kings County to Westchester County pursuant to CPLR 510 (3).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
In connection with their motion for a change of venue, the defendants failed to establish that the witnesses for whose convenience the change was sought were willing to testify, and that those witnesses would in fact be inconvenienced in the event that the change was not granted (see, Schneider v Montalbano, 223 AD2d 586). The defendants accordingly failed to demonstrate their entitlement to relief pursuant to CPLR 510 (3) (see, O’Brien v Vassar Bros. Hosp., 207 AD2d 169). Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.