Posin v. Russo
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Allied Bingo Supplies of Florida, Inc. v. Hynes (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
- In re Russo (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)
- Posin v. Russo (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 626 to recover damages for the waste of corporate assets and for an
Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to Matthew Russo’s contention, there was sufficient evidence in the record to support the trial court’s determination that he was obligated to pay $642,676.57 to the plaintiff for converted funds, and there is no basis to disturb that determination (see, Cohen v Hallmark Cards, 45 NY2d 493, 498-499; Mortensen v Memorial Hosp., 105 AD2d 151, 158; Mertsaris v 73rd Corp., 105 AD2d 67, 82-83; Kiker v Nassau County, 175 AD2d 99).
The parties’ remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., McGinity, Luciano and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.