People v. Guzman
Opinion of the Court
—Judgment, Su
The proof was legally sufficient and the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. The requisite larcenous intent can be reasonably inferred from the evidence. Defendant’s related arguments are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them.
We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence. Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Ellerin, Lerner and Andrias, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.