DeBerardinis v. Sunderland
Opinion of the Court
—In
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Election Law § 6-132 requires that each signature on a designating petition bear the date it was made. Because the date is a matter of prescribed content, strict compliance is required (see, Matter of MacKay v Cochran, 264 AD2d 699, 700). Although certain defects in a designating petition are curable (see, Election Law § 6-134 [2]), the Supreme Court properly determined that the cure provision of Election Law § 6-134 (2) was not applicable to this deficiency. Therefore, the petitions are invalid.
The petitioner’s remaining contention is without merit. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, O’Brien and Santucci, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.