People v. Gomez
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Sherrill (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
- People v. Reese (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
- People v. Rosario (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by the
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s claim that his sentence constituted cruel and unusual punishment is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Bolton, 239 AD2d 511; People v Mateo, 144 AD2d 388). In any event, his contention is without merit (see, People v Broadie, 37 NY2d 100, cert denied 423 US 950; People v Davis, 190 AD2d 908).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are also unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Mackey, 77 NY2d 846; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662; People v Brown, 242 AD2d 337). Mangano, P. J., S. Miller, McGinity, Luciano and Smith, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.