Lamberty v. Schriver
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Bradley, J.), entered November 22, 1999 in Ulster County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services withholding petitioner’s good-time allowance.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, is currently serving a prison sentence of 10 to 20 years upon his conviction of the crimes of
We affirm. It is well settled that a decision to withhold good-time allowance that is made in accordance with the law is not subject to judicial review (see, Correction Law § 803 [4]). Contrary to petitioner’s contention, participation in sex offender and aggression therapy programs does not violate his 5th Amendment rights (see, Matter of Burke v Goord, 273 AD2d 575). We similarly are unpersuaded by petitioner’s assertion that his failure to participate in treatment programs that were “recommended” rather than “assigned” may not serve as a basis for withholding his good-time allowance (see, id., at 575; Matter of Ferry v Goord, 268 AD2d 720, 721, lv denied 94 NY2d 763). Inasmuch as petitioner failed to receive treatment for the very behavior that resulted in his incarceration, we find that the determination to withhold his good-time allowance is neither irrational nor contrary to law (see, Matter of Jones v Coombe, 269 AD2d 632, lv denied 95 NY2d 755; Matter of Ferry v Goord, supra, at 721).
Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.