Bevona v. David Lipton/31 West 47th Street Co.
Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered on or about August 25, 1999, which denied petitioner’s motion to restore to the court calendar his petition to confirm an arbitration award, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, the motion granted and the petition reinstated.
Petitioner has demonstrated that his case was meritorious, that he had a reasonable excuse for the delay, that there was no intent on his part to abandon the matter, and that there was no prejudice to the opposing party (CPLR 3404; Ramputi v Timko Contr. Corp., 262 AD2d 26). It is apparent that law office failure explains the delay in moving to restore. In light of the merits of the petition and the absence of prejudice to
We have considered respondents’ remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.