Coffey v. Brodsky
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Yanovsky v. 833 Flatbush, LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- Dery v. DeCostole Carting, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
- LDV Enterprises, Inc. v. Puma (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for injury to real property, the defendant, William Brodsky, individually and d/b/a Broad-Sky Properties, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rock-land County (Bergerman, J.), dated December 3, 1999, which granted the plaintiffs motion to add Rockhill Building Corporation as an additional defendant.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The appellant, William Brodsky, individually and d/b/a Broad-Sky Properties is not aggrieved by the order which granted the plaintiffs motion to add Rockhill Building Corporation as an additional defendant under the relation-back doctrine (see, Poulard v Papamihlopoulos, 254 AD2d 266). Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed. Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Sullivan and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.