People v. Smith
Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the de
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contentions with respect to the trial court’s instructions on burglary are unpreserved for appellate review and we decline to review them in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review, without merit, or harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt. Friedmann, J. P., Gold-stein, H. Miller and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.