Cipher v. Goord
Opinion of the Court
Determination unanimously modified on the law and as modified confirmed without costs and matter remitted to respondent for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: The misbehavior report, other documentary evidence and petitioner’s admissions constitute substantial evidence to support the determination that petitioner violated inmate rule 107.20 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [8] [iii] [making false statements]; see, Matter of Foster v Coughlin, 76 NY2d 964, 966). Petitioner’s explanation for those statements merely raised a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, Matter of Foster v Coughlin, supra, at 966). We conclude, however, that the determination that petitioner violated inmate rule 107.11 (7
Petitioner failed to contend in his administrative appeal that he should have been provided with a copy of an alleged letter he wrote to the Commissioner’s office and thus that contention is not properly before us (see, Matter of Nelson v Coughlin, 188 AD2d 1071, appeal dismissed 81 NY2d 834). (CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J.) Present — Hayes, J. P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Lawton, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.