Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000

Tomassi v. Dominic

Tomassi v. Dominic
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 27, 2000
278 A.D.2d 880; 718 N.Y.S.2d 915; 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13735
Tomassi v. Dominic

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing *881the cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress. The conduct alleged is not sufficiently extreme or outrageous to support recovery on that theory (see, Dillon v City of New York, 261 AD2d 34, 41; DeFilippo v Xerox Corp., 223 AD2d 846, 847-848, lv dismissed 87 NY2d 1056; Foley v Mobil Chem. Co., 214 AD2d 1003, 1005). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Parker, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Pine, J. P., Wisner, Hurlbutt and Kehoe, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.