Kelley C. v. Kim M.
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Matter of Michael S. v. Sultana R. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
- Ricks v. Brown (District Court, W.D. New York 2020)
- WEAVER, ELSWORTH L. v. DURFEY, PAMELA L. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court properly determined that these paternity proceedings are barred by res judicata. Petitioner contends that res judicata should not apply because the court in the prior paternity proceedings dismissed the petitions therein without considering the results of DNA testing, which indicated a high probability that respondent is the children’s father. The order dismissing the prior petitions was dated June 19, 1995, and Family Court Act § 532 (a) was amended effective June 15, 1994 to establish a rebuttable presumption of paternity in cases in which a genetic marker or DNA test indicates a probability of paternity of 95% or greater (see, L 1994, ch 170, § 354). Assuming, arguendo, that the amendment relates to a procedural matter rather than a substantive right and was thus applicable to cases “currently pending in the courts” at the time it took effect (Matter of Hrouda v Winne, 112 AD2d 304, 305), we conclude that the amendment “cannot be used to reopen matters in which a final order or judgment has already been obtained [citation omitted] and from which the time to appeal has expired or the right of appeal has been exhausted” (Matter of Hrouda v Winne, supra, at 305). Petitioner never appealed from the prior order, and thus res judicata bars these proceedings.
Petitioner further contends that her children were not in privity with her in the prior proceedings and that, because a Law Guardian was not appointed to protect their interests in
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.