Carrasquillo v. Netsloh Realty Corp.
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Yargeau v. Lasertron (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
- Suarez v. Shapiro Family Realty Associates, LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- GRASSO, BARBARA v. MCCOY, ROBERT (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Northern Leasing Systems, Inc. v. Estate of Turner (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- Baulieu v. Ardsley Associates L.P. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- Diamond State Insurance v. Utica First Insurance (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Michael DeMarco, J.), entered March 7, 2000, which, to the extent appealed and cross-appealed from as limited by the parties’ briefs, granted defendants’ motion to strike the note of issue, strike the case from the trial calendar and compel discovery, and defendants’ motion for reargument of a prior discovery motion, to the limited extent of directing that plaintiffs furnish their CPLR 3101 (d) responses and their authorization for the infant plaintiff’s records from the Department of Social Services and his pre-natal records, and directing plaintiffs’ depositions and a physical examination of the infant, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to strike the provisions requiring plaintiffs to furnish defendants with authorizations to obtain the infant plaintiff’s records from the Department of Social Services and his pre-natal records, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
Under the unique circumstances of this case and in light of the frequency with which both sides have resorted to judicial intervention in discovery disputes in the three years prior to the instant motion to strike the note of issue, the failure of defendants to include an affirmation of good faith is excusable because any effort to resolve the present dispute non-judicially would have been “futile” (see, Qian v Dugan, 256 AD2d 782;
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.