Pellew v. Goldstein
Opinion of the Court
In
Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the complaint is dismissed.
The plaintiff alleged that the defendant Jeffrey Klein committed dental malpractice in failing to take timely remedial measures after he lodged a root canal file in her mouth during the course of a dental procedure. At trial, the plaintiffs expert testified that the plaintiffs tooth was removed because of an infection. However, he failed to testify that the infection, which existed before the plaintiff visited Dr. Klein, became untreatable because of Dr. Klein’s alleged malpractice. Accordingly, there was no proof that any departure from accepted practice was a proximate cause of injury or damage (see, Lyons v McCauley, 252 AD2d 516). Therefore, the judgment in favor of the plaintiff must be reversed and the complaint dismissed (see, Falotico v Frankel, 232 AD2d 607). Bracken, Acting P. J., Altman, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.