People v. Wilson
Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Wade, J.), rendered August 13, 1997, convicting him
Ordered that the judgment and the resentence are affirmed.
The court did not err in denying the defendant’s challenge of a prospective juror for cause. The record does not support a finding that the prospective juror possessed “a state of mind that [was] likely to preclude [her] from rendering an impartial verdict based upon evidence adduced at the trial” (CPL 270.20 [1] [b]), or that there was a substantial risk that she would be unable to discharge her responsibilities as a juror (see, People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600).
The defendant’s sentence is not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Bracken, Acting P. J., Altman, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.