People v. Zapata
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by the de
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
All of the statements made by the defendant before he was advised of and knowingly waived his Miranda rights (see, Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436) were made in a non-custodial context. Thus, the statements were admissible (see, People v Steed, 222 AD2d 536; People v Lovette, 212 AD2d 639; People v Edwards, 124 AD2d 818).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Bracken, Acting P. J., O’Brien, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.