Hartford Fire Insurance v. Merchants Mutual Insurance
Opinion of the Court
—In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the defendant is required to provide primary automobile liability
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable by the defendant.
The Supreme Court correctly found that, under the plain and unambiguous terms of the automobile liability insurance policy issued by the defendant to Cable Optic Communications, Inc. (see, Government Empls. Ins. Co. v Kligler, 42 NY2d 863, 864), the defendant is required to extend primary coverage to Cable Optix Communications, Inc., and John D. Breitenbach.
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Friedmann, Goldstein and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.