Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001

Hegler v. Loews Roosevelt Field Cinemas, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided February 26, 2001

280 A.D.2d 645; 720 N.Y.S.2d 844; 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1787

Cases that cite this one

9 later published cases cite this decision.

Deutsch v. Grunwald (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
Deutsch v. Grunwald (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
Blauman-Spindler v. Blauman (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
Shirinova v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
Diel v. Rosenfeld (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)
Petracca v. Petracca (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
Fanelli v. Fanelli (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
Young v. Long Island University (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
Williams v. Way (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Joseph, J.), dated September 12, 2000, which denied their mo*646tion pursuant to CPLR 3101 (d) to preclude the defendant’s expert from testifying at trial.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied, on both procedural and substantive grounds, the plaintiffs’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3101 (d) to preclude the defendant’s expert from testifying at trial. The plaintiffs’ attorney failed to provide the required affirmation of a good-faith effort to resolve the issues raised by the motion (see, 22 NYCRR 202.7 [a] [2]; Barnes v NYNEX, Inc., 274 AD2d 368; Romero v Korn, 236 AD2d 598; Gonzalez v International Bus. Machs. Corp., 236 AD2d 363). Moreover, the expert disclosure provided by the defendant pursuant to CPLR 3101 (d) (1) was adequate (see, Marshall v 130 N. Bedford Rd. Mount Kisco Corp., 277 AD2d 432; McGlauflin v Wadhwa, 265 AD2d 534). O’Brien, J. P., Friedmann, Goldstein and Smith, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.