People v. Potter
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Ohlig, J.), rendered April 20, 1999, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738) in which she moves to be relieved of the assignment to prosecute this appeal.
Ordered that the motion is granted, Debra Ann Urbano is relieved as attorney for the defendant and she is directed to turn over all papers in her possession to new counsel assigned herein; and it is further,
Ordered that Salvatore Adamo, 22 Malone St., East Hampton, N. Y., 11937, is assigned as counsel to perfect the appeal; and it is further,
Ordered that the People are directed to furnish a copy of the stenographic minutes to the new assigned counsel; and it is further,
Based upon this Court’s independent review of the record, we conclude that arguable issues exist with respect, inter alia, to whether the defendant was apprised that his sentence would be enhanced if he were subsequently arrested prior to sentencing and whether the court conducted a proper inquiry at sentencing to determine if the new charges made against the defendant were baseless. Under the circumstances, the motion of the defendant’s assigned counsel to be relieved as counsel is granted and new appellate counsel is assigned (see, People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606; People v Casiano, 67 NY2d 906; People v Miller, 99 AD2d 1021). Santucci, J. P., Altman, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.