In re the Claim of Pierro
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- In re the Claim of Survilla (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
- In re the Claim of Lyczek (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 14, 1999, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant challenges a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that she was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she was terminated from her employment as a receptionist due to misconduct. The record establishes that claimant left her desk at 4:15 p.m., notwithstanding her supervisor’s instructions to wait until 4:25 p.m. in order to receive additional outgoing mail from the company president. Insubordination and failure to abide by a reasonable request of the employer have been held to constitute disqualifying misconduct (see, Matter of Soto [Commissioner of Labor], 262 AD2d 693; Matter of Barry [Hu
Crew III, J. P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.