Chelsea Piers Management v. Forest Electric Corp.
Cases that cite this one
18 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Johnson (New York Criminal Court 2025)
- Wade v. Giacobbe (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2019)
- Yesenia S. v. New York City Hous. Auth. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
- Galisia v. Espinal (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- Coretto v. Extell West 57th Street, LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Orchard Hotel, LLC v. D.A.B. Group, LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Orchard Hotel, LLC v. D.A.B. Group, LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Justino v. Santiago (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Justino v. Santiago (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Red Zone LLC v. Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Red Zone LLC v. Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Queens Unit Venture v. Tyson Court Owners Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Queens Unit Venture v. Tyson Court Owners Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Ramos v. City of New York (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- NYCTL 1999-1 Trust v. 114 Tenth Avenue Assoc., Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
- Zebulun v. Mamadou Oury Bah (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
- Healthworld Corp. v. Gottlieb (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)
- Cuccia v. City of New York (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland De-Grasse, J.), entered January 28, 2000, which, inter alia, denied the motion of defendant Indemnity Insurance Company of North America (IINA) to renew its opposition to plaintiffs’ previously granted cross motion for summary judgment declaring that defendant IINA is obligated to defend and indemnify plaintiffs in the underlying action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
IINA’s motion for renewal was properly denied since the evidentiary matter upon which it was premised, a mere restatement in affidavit form of information supplied to plaintiffs by IINA at the time IINA rejected their insurance claim, was available to IINA at the time of the original motion and no viable excuse has been submitted for the failure to submit it at that time. Renewal is not available as a “second chance” for parties who have not exercised due diligence in making their first factual presentation (see, Rubinstein v Goldman, 225 AD2d 328, lv denied 88 NY2d 815). Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Lerner and Saxe, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.