Glanzer v. Keilin & Bloom L. L. C.
Cases that cite this one
17 later published cases cite this decision.
- Cronos Group Ltd. v. XComIP, LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- Gutkowski v. Steinbrenner (District Court, S.D. New York 2010)
- Weisenfeld v. Iskander (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2020)
- Ridenhour v. Bryant (District Court, S.D. New York 2020)
- Zakrzewski v. Luxoft USA, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- 31 Cornelia Properties Corp. v. Lemma (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Benham v. eCommission Solutions, LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Benham v. eCommission Solutions, LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Madariaga v. Union Bancaire Privee (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Madariaga v. Union Bancaire Privee (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Wilshire Westwood Plaza LLC v. UBS Real Estate Securities, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Hedge Fund Capital Partners v. Thor Asset Management, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- Glatt v. Mariner Partners, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- Rivas v. AmeriMed USA, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
- Rivas v. AmeriMed USA, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
- Binyan Shel Chessed, Inc. v. Goldberger Insurance Brokerage, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
- Coppola v. Applied Electric Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered December 17, 1999, which, insofar as appealed from, granted defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ causes of action for fraud, negligent misrepresentation and breach of contract for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiffs allege that they were recruited and then induced to remain with defendant investment banking firm by false promises of substantial compensation consistent with industry standards for senior investment advisors, including an equity interest in the firm “as soon as it could be determined that there was a ‘fit’ among all parties”; that although plaintiffs performed their work in a superior manner, defendants did not compensate them as promised; that defendants’ promises were made with an intent not to keep them; and that as a result of
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.