Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 21, 2001
281 A.D.2d 814; 722 N.Y.S.2d 188
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1981, was suspended by this Court’s order dated June 7, 1999 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (262 AD2d 702).

Respondent has now complied with the registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and has paid the fees as required by the statute and rules of the Chief Administrative Judge. Petitioner does not object to respondent’s instant application for reinstatement.

Respondent’s application is granted, and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Cardona P. J., Mercure, Crew HI, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted, and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an at*815torney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.