Karram v. Cirillo
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Haust v. United States (District Court, N.D. New York 2013)
- Gawera v. Scrogg (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)
- Graczyk v. Allen (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2023)
- Bixler v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint. Defendant failed to meet his initial burden of establishing his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. The submissions of defendant in support of the motion raise triable issues of fact whether he activated his turn signal and whether he came to an abrupt stop without warning prior to the accident (see, Weber v Chapman, 238 AD2d 946; Silvestro v Wartella, 224 AD2d 799; Thorndike v Coombes, 63 AD2d 843, 845). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Shaheen, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Green, Kehoe, Burns and Lawton, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.