Marlin Entertainment Group, Ltd. v. Mansoor
Opinion of the Court
—In an action to enforce a confession of judgment, Amos Weinberg, attorney for the nonparty City Marshall of the City of New York, appeals from an order of the Supreme
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Upon the consideration of the attendant circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court’s imposition of a sanction against the appellant was a provident exercise of its discretion (see, 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 [a], [c], [d]; 130-l.la [b]; Clark v J.R.D. Mgt. Corp., 248 AD2d 581; cf., Haddad v Haddad, 272 AD2d 371; see generally, Matter of Minister, Elders & Deacons of Refm. Prot. Dutch Church v 198 Broadway, 76 NY2d 411). Krausman, J. P., Friedmann, Feuerstein and Smith, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.