Gad v. Gad
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- Johnson v. Chapin (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
- Wechsler v. Wechsler (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
- Matter of Olga P. v. Ioannis Y. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2020)
- Johnson v. Chapin (N.Y. 2009)
- Ayoub v. Ayoub (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- Galvano v. Galvano (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- Fox v. Fox (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- Sumner v. Sumner (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marjory Fields, J.), entered on or about January 9, 2001, which directed
We decline to disturb the award, there being no showing of either exigent circumstances or a failure by the motion court to properly consider the factors specified in Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (6) and § 237 (a). Traditionally, an aggrieved party’s remedy for any perceived inequities in the award has been a speedy trial (see, Anonymous v Anonymous, 241 AD2d 353; Charpie v Charpie, 271 AD2d 169, 171-172). Nowadays, if a pendente lite award is found at trial to be excessive, the court can remedy the inequity by appropriate adjustment in the equitable distribution award. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Williams, Mazzarelli, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.