Eastman Kodak Co. v. Prometheus Funding Corp.
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- MERCONE, ANTONIO v. MONROE COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFFS' ASSN (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- Mercone v. Monroe County Deputy Sheriffs' Ass'n (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- Pike v. New York Life Insurance (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
- Castle Oil Corp. v. Thompson Pension Employee Plans, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered September 5, 2000, dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered August 28, 2000, granting defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 as time-barred, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the ensuing judgment.
Defendant is sued as the successor in interest to Frank B. Hall & Co., an insurance broker through which plaintiff purchased numerous excess and/or umbrella liability policies. Plaintiff alleges that Frank B. Hall mishandled claims made by it under the subject policies and that coverage was consequently denied, leaving plaintiff exposed to substantial liability. We agree with Supreme Court that plaintiffs action is time-barred.
Contrary to plaintiff’s contention, the continuous representation doctrine is not applicable to insurance brokers and they are not professionals within the purview of CPLR 214 (6) (see,
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.