Village of Brockport v. Webster
Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and judgment granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiff, the Village of Brockport (Village), commenced this action against defendants, the owners of residential properties in the Village, seeking, inter alia, an injunction directing defendants to cease and desist their alleged violations of certain zoning provisions of the Village Code. In their third affirmative defense, defendants allege that the limitation of occupancy of single-family residences based upon the definition of “family” in section 58-2 of the Brockport Village Code is illegal, discriminatory, void and unenforceable under the New York Constitution and laws of the State of New York and the United States Constitution.
Supreme Court properly concluded that the challenged section of the Code does not violate the New York Constitution (see, Matter of Unification Theol. Seminary u City of Poughkeepsie, 201 AD2d 484), the Human Rights Law (Executive Law art 15; see, McMinn v Town of Oyster Bay, 105 AD2d 46, 50, affd 66 NY2d 544), or the United States Constitution (see, Village of Belle Terre v Boraas, 416 US 1), and thus properly denied defendants’ cross motion for judgment on the third affirmative defense. The court erred, however, in granting judg
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.