People v. Pearson
Opinion of the Court
—Judgment,
Defendant’s challenges to the People’s cross-examination and summation are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that the flat contradiction between defendant’s testimony and that of the police witnesses was properly explored on cross-examination and summation by asking whether defendant would characterize segments of police testimony as “lies” (see, People v Overlee, 236 AD2d 133, lv denied 91 NY2d 976). Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Nardelli, Ellerin, Buckley and Marlow, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.