People v. Stultz
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Calabrese, J.), rendered October 31, 1995, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress identification testimony and his statement to law enforcement authorities.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The evidence against the defendant consisted, inter alia, of identification testimony and evidence that his nickname “Noey” and beeper number were found written on a piece of paper in the decedent’s room. The admission of testimony that subsequent to his arrest, the defendant responded to the nickname “Noey,” if error, was harmless. “[T]he substantive content of the statement was * * * duplicative of other statements made by the defendant which were properly admitted in evidence” (People v Anderson, 200 AD2d 750, 751). The detective who took the defendant’s pedigree information testified that he used certain aliases, i.e., Sam Smith, Noel Smith, and Noey, and his address was 676 Montgomery Street, Brooklyn, New York. An employee of Multi Communications testified that the beeper number was issued to Sam Smith, whose address was 676 Montgomery Street, Brooklyn, New York.
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J. P., Goldstein, Feuerstein and Crane, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.