Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001

In re the Claim of Soto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 28, 2001

284 A.D.2d 851; 726 N.Y.S.2d 597; 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6860

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

In re the Claim of Dangler (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
In re the Claim of Trzeciak (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 7, 2000, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

*852Claimant contends that she resigned from her position as a traffic manager in a factory because the stress engendered by her job adversely affected her health. Claimant offered no medical evidence to support her contention (see, Matter of Spaulding [Commissioner of Labor], 264 AD2d 881, 882; Matter of Cooper [Sweeney], 232 AD2d 678). Under these circumstances, we find substantial evidence to support the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s decision that claimant voluntarily left her employment without good cause (see, Matter of Maine [Commissioner of Labor], 282 AD2d 854; Matter of Cooper [Sweeney], supra).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.