Silverite Construction Co. v. Town of North Hempstead
Opinion of the Court
βIn an action to
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The parties stipulated that the plaintiff was entitled to recover $50,000, representing damages incurred through April 22, 1987. However, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs application for leave to amend the complaint to include a claim for damages allegedly incurred after April 22, 1987. Leave to amend a pleading should be denied where, as here, the proposed amendment is devoid of merit (see, Fucci v Shellfish, Inc., 277 AD2d 280; Tarantini v Russo Realty Corp., 273 AD2d 458; Fandy Corp. v Lung-Fong Chen, 265 AD2d 450).
The plaintiffs remaining contentions are not properly raised on this appeal. Santucci, J. P., Goldstein, Florio and Crane, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.