Anstu Farm, L. L. C. v. Town Board of Washington
Opinion of the Court
—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a de
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition based upon a local zoning ordinance which became effective during the pendency of this proceeding, prohibiting the construction of private heliports (see, Matter of Demisay, Inc. v Petito, 31 NY2d 896; Matter of Marasco v Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 242 AD2d 724; Matter of Miller v Southold Town, 190 AD2d 672; Matter of Shiloh Gospel Chapel v Roer, 170 AD2d 608). Since the petitioner was not entitled to a permit for a private heliport as a matter of right prior to the enactment of the ordinance, this case does not fall within the so-called “special facts exception” (Matter of Pokoik v Silsdorf, 40 NY2d 769, 772; see, General Business Law § 249; Thomson Indus. v Incorporated Vil. of Port Washington N., 32 AD2d 1072, affd 27 NY2d 537). Accordingly, the existing ordinance is controlling {see, Preble Aggregate v Town of Preble, 263 AD2d 849). Altman, J. P., H. Miller, Smith and Cozier, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.