Mandel v. Johnson
Mandel v. Johnson
285 A.D.2d 630; 728 N.Y.S.2d 669; 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7682
Opinion of the Court
βIn an action, inter alia, to re
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs motion to restore the action to the trial calendar, since he failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for his delay (see, CPLR 3404; Furniture Vil. v Schoenberger, 283 AD2d 607; Lopez v Imperial Delivery Serv., 282 AD2d 190). Santucci, J. P., Altman, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.