Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001

Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Center v. Ruscito

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 15, 2001

287 A.D.2d 538; 731 N.Y.S.2d 645; 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9551

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

Romanello v. Jason (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
Paul v. Long Island Lighting Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
Government Employees Insurance v. Woney (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
Williams v. Fitzsimmons (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
Malik v. Campbell (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

—In an action for a judgment declar*539ing that the plaintiff is the owner of the subject property, the defendant Anna Ruscito appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Seidell, J.), dated October 3, 2000, as denied her motion for leave to reargue and renew the plaintiff’s motion to strike her answer for failure to comply with court-ordered discovery.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as denied that branch of the appellant’s motion which was for leave to reargue is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs.

A motion for leave to renew should be denied unless the moving party offers a reasonable excuse as to why the new facts were not submitted on the prior motion (see, CPLR 2221 [e]; Palmer v Toledo, 266 AD2d 268). The appellant failed to offer a reasonable justification for her failure to comply with discovery (see, Kilgore v Rochdale Vil., 252 AD2d 516; Mayer v McBrunigan Constr. Corp., 123 AD2d 606). O’Brien, J. P., S. Miller, McGinity, Schmidt and Townes, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.