People v. Viano
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Yunga (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- People v. Taylor (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- People v. Baxter (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
—Appeals by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered August 24, 1999, convicting him of driving while intoxicated as a felony, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence, and (2) a resentence of the same court, imposed January 12, 2000.
Ordered that the judgment and the resentence are affirmed.
The defendant was indicted on one count of driving while intoxicated as a felony, pursuant to Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (3). Although the defendant’s prior conviction of driving while intoxicated elevated the offense charged from a misdemeanor to a felony, the prosecution did not file a special information regarding the prior conviction at the same time as the indictment, pursuant to CPL 200.60. The trial court, over the defendant’s objection, granted the prosecution’s request to file the special information prior to the close of the People’s case.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the prosecution’s
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moroever, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). O’Brien, J. P., Friedmann, Smith and Cozier, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.