People v. Hicks
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Kelly, J.), rendered April 14, 1999, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, kidnapping in the second degree (two counts), robbery in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and endangering the welfare of a child, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the police lacked probable cause for his arrest is without merit. Probable cause to arrest requires the existence of facts and circumstances which, when viewed as a whole, would lead a reasonable person possessing the same expertise as the arresting officer to conclude that an offense has been or is being committed and that the defendant committed or is committing that offense (see, People v Bigelow,
As the complainant’s showup identification was in close temporal and geographical proximity to the incident, it was not unduly suggestive (see, People v Sharpe, 259 AD2d 639; People v Tarangelo, 258 AD2d 305; People v Ellison, 222 AD2d 693; People v Grassia, 195 AD2d 607). Santucci, J. P., S. Miller, Friedmann and Cozier, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.